Amplitude attributes: RMS, envelope, and their friends

Part 6, Seismic Attributes

Learning objectives

  • Define what a seismic attribute is and why interpreters compute them
  • Compute RMS amplitude, envelope, and related attributes from a seismic trace
  • Choose appropriate window lengths for different geological questions
  • Interpret amplitude attribute maps with awareness of tuning and gain artifacts

A seismic section shows amplitude against time at every trace, and that one view hides a good deal. A fault may show only as a slight break in the continuity of the reflections, which a trained eye catches and a beginner misses. A thinning reservoir may show as a change in amplitude that is hard to judge by eye. A channel may be plain on a time slice at the right depth and invisible on a section. Seismic attributes are quantities computed from the same samples that make one such property easier to see or to measure.

What is a seismic attribute?

An attribute is any quantity computed from the seismic data that brings out a property of interest. The usual families:

  • Amplitude attributes: magnitude, RMS, the envelope. They measure how strong the reflections are at each place (this section).
  • Frequency attributes: spectral decomposition, dominant frequency, bandwidth. They measure what frequencies the local wavelet carries, which helps with thin beds and lithology (Section 6.2).
  • Geometric attributes: dip, azimuth, curvature. They describe the orientation and the shape of the reflectors (Section 6.3).
  • Coherence and discontinuity: measures of how alike neighbouring traces are, which bring out faults and channel edges (Section 6.4).
  • Combined and classified attributes, built from the others (Section 6.5).

An attribute is derived from the seismic, so it adds no physical information the data did not already hold. What it adds is visibility: it makes one property easier for the eye to recognise, or for an algorithm to classify. A good attribute brings out something the interpreter cares about; a careless one can manufacture features that are not there.

The simplest attribute: magnitude

Take the absolute value of each sample, ∣a(t)∣|a(t)|. Peaks and troughs both become positive, so the strength of each reflection shows without the alternation of sign that a red-blue display carries. It is a first map of where the data has energy, whatever the polarity.

Magnitude is also the bluntest amplitude attribute: it is one sample, so it falls to zero wherever the trace crosses zero, even in the middle of a strong reflection. Every other amplitude attribute deals with that in its own way.

RMS amplitude

Root-mean-square amplitude over a sliding window is the workhorse among amplitude attributes. Over the W=2h+1W = 2h + 1 samples centred on time tt:

RMS(t)=1Wβˆ‘k=βˆ’hha(t+k Δt)2\mathrm{RMS}(t) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{W}\sum_{k=-h}^{h} a(t + k\,\Delta t)^2}

where Ξ”t\Delta t is the sample interval. RMS is never negative, and it is the typical size of the samples near tt: one reflection folded, peak and trough together, into one value. Two close relatives use the same window: the mean absolute amplitude, the mean of ∣a∣|a| (less swayed by a single large sample), and the variance, the spread of the samples about their mean. A moving average of ∣a∣|a| is sometimes offered as a cheap envelope; it is the mean absolute amplitude by another name, not the envelope, and Figure 6.1 lists it once, under that name.

Two choices matter:

  • Window length. A window of WW samples spans WΞ”tW\Delta t: 13 samples at 4 ms are 52 ms. A short window, a cycle or so of the wavelet, measures single reflections; a long one averages an interval. Reservoir work usually sizes the window to the zone of interest (say 30 ms about a target horizon); regional mapping may use 60 to 100 ms to bring out broad trends.
  • Window position. A centred window gives a value at every sample, looking the same distance up and down. Most reservoir workflows instead hang the window on an interpreted horizon (10 ms above to 20 ms below it, say), which is the subject of Section 6.6.

The envelope, phase and instantaneous frequency

Taner, Koehler and Sheriff (1979) treated the trace a(t)a(t) as the real part of a complex analytic signal, z(t)=a(t)+i Ha(t)z(t) = a(t) + i\,\mathcal{H}a(t), whose imaginary part is the Hilbert transform of the trace: the same trace with every frequency shifted by a quarter cycle. Three attributes follow, at every sample:

  • the envelope, or instantaneous amplitude, e(t)=∣z(t)∣=a2+(Ha)2e(t) = |z(t)| = \sqrt{a^2 + (\mathcal{H}a)^2};
  • the instantaneous phase, Ο†(t)=arg⁑z(t)\varphi(t) = \arg z(t), so that a(t)=e(t)cos⁑φ(t)a(t) = e(t)\cos\varphi(t): 0∘0^\circ at a peak, 180∘180^\circ at a trough;
  • the instantaneous frequency, fi(t)=12π dΟ†dtf_i(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\,\frac{d\varphi}{dt}, how fast the phase turns.

The envelope is the smooth curve that bounds the trace on both sides. Where the trace crosses zero inside a reflection, Ha\mathcal{H}a is near its largest, so the envelope stays high: it measures the wavelet, not one point on it. Rotating the phase of the wavelet changes aa but not ee, which is why the envelope is preferred for comparing amplitudes between data of different phase.

Phase carries no amplitude at all. A weak reflection runs through the same cycle of phase as a strong one, so a phase display draws the continuity of every layer with equal weight. The instantaneous frequency is easily upset: where the envelope is small the phase turns erratically, and fif_i can jump or even go negative, so read it where the envelope is large. Figure 6.1 therefore averages it over the window with the squared envelope as the weight, fΛ‰=βˆ‘e2fi/βˆ‘e2\bar f = \sum e^2 f_i \big/ \sum e^2, which keeps the frequency of the strong wavelets and discounts the quiet samples between them (Barnes 2007). On F3 the raw fif_i leaves the range 0 to 125 Hz, the Nyquist frequency, at 2% of samples; weighted over 13 samples it never does.

Figure 6.1 takes the Hilbert transform with a 63-tap filter. On F3 its envelope is within 0.5% of the cube’s RMS of an exact transform at the median sample, and within 2.3% at 95% of samples.

Figure 6.1. Amplitude attributes on the F3 surveyAt inline 400, crossline 591 and 1044β€―ms the RMS amplitude over 13 samples (52β€―ms) is 2.63times the cube’s RMS, higher than 99Β % of the slice. The trace there reads βˆ’3.16 and itsenvelope, the height of the whole wavelet, 3.18; weighted by the envelope over the 13-samplewindow, its instantaneous frequency is 36Β Hz.(a) Seismic, inline 400crossline 500699400 ms1596(b) RMS amplitude, the same slicecrossline 500699400 ms1596(a) In units of the cube RMS, blue negative and the accent positive, saturating at 3; time down.(b) Coloured 0.25 to 2.06, percentiles of the slice. The circle marks the probe.Data courtesy of dGB Earth Sciences / Open Seismic Repository, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Figure 6.1 computes these attributes on the F3 volume of Section 1.0, an inline, a crossline or a time slice at a time. The probe, where the lines cross, is one sample; plate (c) shows its trace with the envelope and the RMS over the window, and every number in the sentence and the table is read off what the plates draw. The exercises under the figure take the attributes in turn:

  • Exercise 1 puts the probe in the strongest reflection of inline 400 and reads its RMS: 2.63 times the cube’s RMS over 13 samples.
  • Exercise 2 lengthens the window to 41 samples at the same place: the bright band thickens and the value falls to 1.66, because the window now includes the quieter layers around the reflection.
  • Exercise 3 sets the probe where the trace crosses zero: the magnitude is 0.37 while the envelope is 4.58. Switching the attribute to the envelope turns the striped bands of the magnitude into smooth ones.
  • Exercise 4 shows instantaneous phase on the same inline, where faint dipping layers between 780 and 960 ms show as clearly as the bright ones.
  • Exercise 5 turns RMS into a map, on the time slice at 1560 ms, where one area is more than five times as bright as the median of the slice.

Common amplitude-attribute pitfalls

  • Gain. RMS and the envelope are in the units of the data, so they carry every gain choice of the processing. Another processing of the same survey gives different values everywhere. Never compare raw amplitudes between datasets without normalising them.
  • Tuning. Where a bed is thinner than about a quarter of a wavelength, the reflections from its top and base interfere. For a Ricker wavelet the composite amplitude peaks at about 1.45 times that of one interface, at a two-way thickness near 1/(2.6fp)1/(2.6 f_p), and falls toward zero for thinner beds. A bright spot can be partly tuning; Section 1.7 shows the effect.
  • Attenuation. The earth absorbs high frequencies along the way, and amplitudes generally weaken with depth. Compare a deep target with its own surroundings, not with shallow amplitudes.
  • Edges. Near the top and the bottom of the traces the window holds fewer samples, so values there rest on less data and can be too high or too low. On inline 400 the only windows brighter than the reflection of exercise 1 lie in the last 16 ms of the traces, where the window is cut short.

When to use which amplitude attribute

  • Magnitude: a quick scan for the strongest single samples; no parameters.
  • RMS, short window (about one cycle, 8 to 15 samples at 4 ms): the brightness of individual reflections; the standard first amplitude map.
  • RMS, long window (40 to 100 samples): interval-averaged amplitude, for regional trends and for separating bright zones from quiet ones.
  • Envelope: amplitude independent of phase, for comparing data of different phase or where a phase rotation would fake a change in brightness.
  • Instantaneous phase: the continuity of reflections whatever their strength, for following weak events and seeing terminations.
  • Variance: how much the amplitude scatters, for chaotic zones where the spread matters more than the size.

Amplitude attributes are usually the first ones computed on a new volume. They are cheap and quick to read, and they show at once where the energy is, where the data is quiet and which bright areas deserve a closer look; they also expose striping, footprint and processing artefacts that would confuse later attributes. Section 6.2 turns to frequency attributes, which describe what the wavelet is made of rather than how strong it is.

References

  • Barnes, A. E. (2007). A tutorial on complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 72(6), W33-W43.
  • Brown, A. R. (2011). Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data (7th ed.). AAPG Memoir 42 / SEG Investigations in Geophysics 9.
  • Chopra, S., & Marfurt, K. J. (2007). Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir Characterization. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  • Kallweit, R. S., & Wood, L. C. (1982). The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets. Geophysics, 47(7), 1035-1046.
  • Sheriff, R. E. (2002). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics (4th ed.). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  • Taner, M. T., Koehler, F., & Sheriff, R. E. (1979). Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 44(6), 1041-1063.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.