Mathematical Notation

Chapter 2: Reading, Writing, and Notating Mathematics

Learning objectives

  • Read and write standard mathematical notation
  • Use summation and product notation
  • Understand quantifiers (for all, there exists)

Mathematical notation is dense for a reason: it compresses long English sentences into symbols you can scan in a second. "The sum, as kk ranges over the integers from 1 to 100, of kk squared" becomes โˆ‘k=1100k2\sum_{k=1}^{100} k^2, same meaning, fraction of the space. This section is a tour of the symbols you will need to fluently read every later chapter, and every math text you ever open.

The connectives and quantifiers

โˆˆ\in, "is an element of." 3โˆˆZ3 \in \mathbb{Z}.

โˆ‰\notin, "is not an element of."

โІ\subseteq, "is a subset of."

โ‡’\Rightarrow, "implies." Pโ‡’QP \Rightarrow Q is the conditional statement from ยงInt.2.

โ‡”\Leftrightarrow, "if and only if." True exactly when PP and QQ have the same truth value.

โˆ€\forall, the universal quantifier, "for all." โˆ€xโˆˆR,x2โ‰ฅ0\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 \geq 0 reads "for every real xx, x2x^2 is non-negative."

โˆƒ\exists, the existential quantifier, "there exists." โˆƒxโˆˆR,x2=2\exists x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 = 2 reads "there exists a real xx with x2=2x^2 = 2" (true; x=2x = \sqrt{2}).

The reference panel below catalogues these and other symbols. Click any one to see its name, how to say it aloud, and one concrete sentence using it, the spoken form is the part that makes reading mathematics out loud feel natural.

Notation reference: symbols you will seeโ„real numbersโˆˆelement ofโŠ‚subset of[a, b]closed interval(a, b)open intervalโ†’maps toโˆ€for allโˆƒthere exists

Summation and product

The summation symbol packages a sum of indexed terms:

โˆ‘i=1nai=a1+a2+โ‹ฏ+an\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i = a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n

The product symbol packages a product:

โˆi=1nai=a1โ‹…a2โ‹ฏan\prod_{i=1}^{n} a_i = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdots a_n

The factorial is a special product: n!=โˆi=1ni=1โ‹…2โ‹…3โ‹ฏnn! = \prod_{i=1}^{n} i = 1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3 \cdots n. By convention 0!=10! = 1 (this convention makes formulas like (n0)=1\binom{n}{0} = 1 work without exception).

Reading and writing quantifier statements

The order of quantifiers MATTERS. โˆ€xโˆˆR,โˆƒyโˆˆR,y>x\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, \exists y \in \mathbb{R}, y > x is true (for every real, there is a larger real). But โˆƒyโˆˆR,โˆ€xโˆˆR,y>x\exists y \in \mathbb{R}, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}, y > x is false (it claims a single yy greater than everyone, which would have to be larger than itself).

The negation rules: ยฌ(โˆ€x,P(x))=โˆƒx,ยฌP(x)\neg(\forall x, P(x)) = \exists x, \neg P(x) and ยฌ(โˆƒx,P(x))=โˆ€x,ยฌP(x)\neg(\exists x, P(x)) = \forall x, \neg P(x). To negate a universal claim, find a single counterexample; to negate an existential claim, show none exists.

Try it

  • Evaluate โˆ‘k=14k2\sum_{k=1}^{4} k^2. Then evaluate โˆ‘k=14(2kโˆ’1)\sum_{k=1}^{4} (2k - 1). Compare the two.
  • Compute โˆi=14(i+1)\prod_{i=1}^{4}(i+1). Express it as a factorial.
  • Translate to symbols: "there exists an integer whose square is 49." Now translate: "for every positive integer nn, the factorial n!โ‰ฅ1n! \geq 1."
  • What is the negation of "โˆ€xโˆˆQ,xโ‰ 0\forall x \in \mathbb{Q}, x \neq 0"? Is the original statement true?

A trap to watch for

Swapping quantifier order silently changes the meaning. "Every student in this class has a favourite number" (โˆ€s,โˆƒn\forall s, \exists n) does NOT say "there is a number that every student in this class favours" (โˆƒn,โˆ€s\exists n, \forall s). The first is almost certainly true; the second almost certainly false. The fix: when reading โˆ€โ€ฆโˆƒโ€ฆ\forall \ldots \exists \ldots, mentally unfold it into English with the "different choice for each" pattern; for โˆƒโ€ฆโˆ€โ€ฆ\exists \ldots \forall \ldots, use the "one choice that works for everyone" pattern.

What you now know

You can read and write summation, product, quantifier, and set-membership notation fluently. This is the last Intermezzo section, the next chapter returns to mathematics proper, opening with the geometry of distance and angles on the plane.

Quick check

References

  • Lang, S. (1971). Basic Mathematics. Springer. Intermezzo, ยง4, mathematical notation, summation, and quantifiers.
  • Velleman, D. (2019). How to Prove It: A Structured Approach, 3rd ed. Cambridge. Chapter 2: quantifiers and their negations.
  • Houston, K. (2009). How to Think Like a Mathematician. Cambridge. Chapter 5: reading and writing mathematical notation deliberately.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.