Three Circles: Mohr in 3D
Learning objectives
- Add the intermediate principal stress and draw the three Mohr circles it creates
- Locate any plane, described by its direction cosines, inside the shaded region between the circles
- Show that the largest shear anywhere still lives on the outer circle, indifferent to the intermediate stress
- Draw the canon triple, 67.7 over 62 over 46 MPa, as its three circles for the first time
The Third Player
Real stress states have three principal values, , and the plane picture generalizes with more grace than it has any right to. Each principal pair draws its own circle, so a 3D state appears as three nested circles: the big one spanning to , and two smaller ones sharing its ends, to and to . A plane whose normal lies along a principal axis plots on the rim of the corresponding circle, exactly as in 2D. And a general plane, tilted toward all three axes and described by its direction cosines , lands somewhere in the crescent-shaped region between the small circles and the big one. No stress state can put a plane outside the big circle or inside the small ones; the shaded lune is the entire admissible world.
Steer the plane in the figure. Tilt it in the - plane and its point rides the outer rim; swing it toward and the point dives into the lune's interior. Then drag itself: as it approaches the lower small circle shrinks to a point, the state becomes axially symmetric, and the picture collapses toward the single circle of the last section. The defaults draw the canon triple for the first time: over over MPa, the vertical stress on top, which Part 5 will name a normal-faulting state.
What the Middle Stress Does, and Does Not
Look where the maximum shear lives: at the crest of the outer circle, MPa for the canon triple, on the plane at 45 degrees between the largest and smallest stresses, containing the axis. Slide anywhere between its neighbors and that number does not move. This is the geometric seed of a modeling choice the whole course leans on: the Coulomb failure criterion of Part 3 judges rocks by and alone, treating the intermediate stress as a spectator. It is not exactly true, laboratory rocks show a modest effect, but it is close, honest about being an approximation, and it buys the two-dimensional clarity every diagram from here to Part 10 will exploit.
References
- Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G. W., & Zimmerman, R. W. (2007). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (4th ed.). Blackwell.
- Zoback, M. D. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press.
- Mohr, O. (1900). Welche Umstaende bedingen die Elastizitaetsgrenze und den Bruch eines Materials? Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure, 44, 1524-1530.