The Stress Polygon

Part 5, Part 5: In-Situ Stress, The Polygon

Learning objectives

  • Assemble the polygon: plot allowable (Shmin, SHmax) states at a given Sv, Pp, and friction
  • Read the three regime triangles, normal, strike-slip, and reverse, that the diagonal and friction bounds define
  • Compute the polygon corners: at hydrostatic Pp, Shmin floor 42.3 and SHmax ceiling 147.0 MPa
  • Place the canon state inside the normal-faulting triangle and see how pore pressure reshapes the whole polygon

Every State the Crust Allows, on One Diagram

The last two sections give everything needed for the single most useful diagram in in-situ stress. Anderson fixes the vertical stress S_vS\_v; friction caps how far the horizontals can spread from it and from each other. Plot the two horizontal stresses against each other, S_hminS\_{hmin} across and S_HmaxS\_{Hmax} up, and the allowable states fill a bounded region: the stress polygon. Its edges are not arbitrary. The diagonal S_Hmax=S_hminS\_{Hmax} = S\_{hmin} bounds it above-left (the horizontals cannot cross). The point where both equal S_vS\_v anchors its center. And the frictional limit qq cuts the outer corners: in normal faulting S_hminS\_{hmin} cannot fall below (S_vP_p)/q+P_p(S\_v - P\_p)/q + P\_p, and in reverse faulting S_HmaxS\_{Hmax} cannot rise above q(S_vP_p)+P_pq(S\_v - P\_p) + P\_p. Every stress state the crust can hold at this depth lives inside that outline; nothing outside it is physically sustainable.

The Stress PolygonInteractive figure, enable JavaScript to interact.

This is the working canvas of the whole second half of the course, so learn to read it. The polygon divides into three regime triangles: normal faulting in the lower-left (both horizontals below S_vS\_v), strike-slip in the middle band (S_vS\_v between them), reverse faulting in the upper-right (both above S_vS\_v). At our canon S_v=67.7S\_v = 67.7 and hydrostatic P_p=30.3P\_p = 30.3 with mu=0.6\\mu = 0.6, the corners read a normal-faulting floor of S_hmin=42.3S\_{hmin} = 42.3 MPa and a reverse-faulting ceiling of S_Hmax=147.0S\_{Hmax} = 147.0 MPa. Drop the canon reservoir state, S_hmin=46S\_{hmin} = 46, S_Hmax=62S\_{Hmax} = 62, onto the diagram and it lands in the normal-faulting triangle, comfortably inside but not central, a real basin sitting toward the frictional edge.

Pore Pressure Breathes the Polygon

Now move the pore-pressure slider and watch the polygon breathe. Raise P_pP\_p and the frictional corners pull inward: the allowable region shrinks, because higher pore pressure means lower effective stresses and the friction limit bites sooner. Push P_pP\_p all the way to S_vS\_v and the polygon collapses to a single point at (S_v,S_v)(S\_v, S\_v), the crust unable to hold any stress difference at all when the fluid carries the entire load. That shrinking is the geometry behind every fault-reactivation and lost-well story in the course: a state that sat safely inside the polygon at hydrostatic pressure can find itself pressed against, or outside, the shrunken boundary when injection or overpressure raises P_pP\_p. The polygon is not a static map; it is a live constraint that pore pressure reshapes, and the next two sections use it to do real work, bounding the one horizontal stress we can measure and the one we cannot.

References

  • Zoback, M. D. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Moos, D., & Zoback, M. D. (1990). Utilization of observations of well bore failure to constrain the orientation and magnitude of crustal stresses. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B6), 9305-9325.
  • Zoback, M. D., et al. (2003). Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40(7-8), 1049-1076.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.