Gas Effect and Crossover

Part 4, Chapter 4: Density and Neutron Porosity

Learning objectives

  • Explain why gas suppresses the neutron and lifts the density porosity
  • Recognize the neutron-density crossover as a gas flag
  • Relate the size of the crossover to the gas saturation
  • Locate the true gas porosity between the two curves

Two Logs, Opposite Errors

Gas does something no liquid does: it fools the two porosity logs in opposite directions. The neutron is a hydrogen counter, and gas has a low hydrogen index, so a gas-filled pore looks nearly empty of hydrogen and the neutron under-reads porosity, ϕNϕ[Sxo+(1Sxo)HIgas]\phi_N \approx \phi,[,S_{xo} + (1-S_{xo}),HI_{gas},] with HIgasHI_{gas} small. The density sees the opposite: gas is very light (about 0.2 g/cc), so the bulk density is too low and the density porosity (computed for a liquid) over-reads. One log too low, the other too high.

The gas crossover010203040porosity (pu)0255075100shalegas sandwater sandshaleneutrondensityGas drops the neutron and lifts the density porosity; the shaded crossover is the gas flag.

The Crossover

Plot the two as porosity on a shared scale that makes them overlay in clean liquid rock, and the gas zone announces itself: the density curve swings to the high-porosity side, the neutron to the low side, and the two cross. The shaded gap between them is the neutron-density crossover, one of the most trusted gas indicators in the whole log suite. Raise the gas saturation in the figure and the crossover opens wider; drop it to zero and the curves snap back together, exactly as they do in the water sand below.

Reading Through the Gas

The crossover is a flag, not a porosity. The neutron is too low and the density too high, so the true porosity sits between the two curves; a common estimate splits the difference (closer to the density in a strong gas effect). The size of the crossover grows with gas saturation, so it doubles as a rough richness indicator. Read it for what it is: the cleanest yes-or-no gas signal the porosity logs can give, sitting right on top of the porosity you came for.

References

  • Asquith, G. and Krygowski, D. (2004). Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. AAPG Methods in Exploration 16.
  • Ellis, D. and Singer, J. (2007). Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed. Springer.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.