The Pickett Plot

Part 7, Chapter 7: Archie's Equation and Water Saturation

Learning objectives

  • Plot porosity against true resistivity on log-log axes
  • Recognize each Sw as a parallel line of slope -1/m
  • Read Rw and m from the 100 percent water line
  • Read a point's Sw from the family of lines

Archie on Log-Log Paper

The Pickett plot is Archie's equation drawn out. Take logs of Rt=a Rw/(Ο•m Swn)R_t = a,R_w/(\phi^{m},S_w^{n}) and the porosity becomes a straight line in the resistivity:

log⁑ϕ=1m(log⁑(a Rw)βˆ’log⁑Rt)βˆ’nmlog⁑Sw.\log\phi = \tfrac{1}{m}\big(\log(a\,R_w) - \log R_t\big) - \tfrac{n}{m}\log S_w.

On a plot of porosity (up) against true resistivity (right), every water saturation is a line, and because only the last term changes with SwS_w, the lines are all parallel, each with slope βˆ’1/m-1/m.

The Pickett plot0.1110100100025102050true resistivity Rt (ohm.m, log)Sw 100% (wet)Sw 50%Sw 30%Sw 20%Sw 10%Sw 19%Each Sw is a parallel line of slope -1/m; the wet line gives m and Rw, a point reads Sw by eye.

The Wet Line

The most useful line is Sw=100%S_w = 100%, the wet line along the lower-left edge, because it is fixed by the rock alone. Its slope is βˆ’1/m-1/m, so it reads the cementation exponent straight off the chart, and its position is set by RwR_w, so it reads the water resistivity too, both without assuming either in advance. That is why a Pickett plot is the first thing an analyst draws: it calibrates mm and RwR_w from the wet points before any saturation is computed.

Reading Sw, and a Warning

With the family drawn, any point reads its water saturation by eye, by which lines it falls between, and a point above and to the right of the wet line holds hydrocarbon. There is a bonus: a real cloud of points that does not fall on a clean set of parallel lines is a warning that the simple Archie model is wrong for the rock, a shaly sand, perhaps, or a complex carbonate. The Pickett plot is as much a quality check as a calculator.

References

  • Pickett, G. R. (1973). Pattern recognition as a means of formation evaluation. The Log Analyst, 14(4).
  • Asquith, G. and Krygowski, D. (2004). Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. AAPG Methods in Exploration 16.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.