Rock Typing and Flow Units
Learning objectives
- Explain why one poro-perm trend cannot fit a whole reservoir
- Define the reservoir quality index and the flow zone indicator
- Use FZI to group data into rock types
- Explain why per-rock-type modeling is more accurate
One Trend Is Not Enough
Earlier you saw permeability predicted from porosity with a single trend. Real reservoirs contain several rock types, each with its own pore geometry and therefore its own poro-perm relationship. Forcing one trend through all of them blurs the good rock into the bad. Rock typing sorts the data into flow units that each behave consistently.
The Flow Zone Indicator
The standard tool is the flow zone indicator. From the reservoir quality index and the normalized porosity , the indicator is . Rocks with the same FZI share a pore geometry and fall on one curve in the porosity-permeability plane, so iso-FZI lines partition the crossplot into rock types. The widget colors a core dataset by FZI band.
Why It Matters
Once the rock types are defined, each gets its own poro-perm transform, its own capillary-pressure curve, and often its own variogram. Permeability modeled per rock type is far more faithful than a single global fit, and the rock types become the framework that ties the petrophysics, the facies model, and the flow behavior together. Rock typing is where static modeling and dynamic behavior first meet.