Source radiation patterns

Physics prerequisites for acquisition

Learning objectives

  • Name the far-field P and S patterns of five idealised sources: an explosion, a buried vertical force, a vertical force on the free surface, a horizontal force and slip on a fault
  • Read a pattern as amplitude against the takeoff angle θ\theta, as a polar plot and in decibels, with its polarity
  • Connect each field source (dynamite, air gun, vibrator, weight drop, shear vibrator, microseismic event) to its idealisation, and say where the idealisation fails
  • Turn a takeoff angle into a reflection offset, x=2ztan⁡θx = 2z\tan\theta, and predict how much P a source sends toward a far-offset target

Only an explosion sends the same amplitude in every direction. Every other source pushes harder along some directions than others, and all of them but the explosion send S as well, two to five times their P peak in a Poisson solid, though not always where their P is weak. For acquisition the direction that matters is the takeoff angle theta\\theta, measured from straight down: with straight rays, a flat reflector at depth zz returns the ray that left at theta\\theta to a receiver at offset x=2ztanthetax = 2z\\tan\\theta. So the radiation pattern tells you, before a single receiver is laid out, how much P each offset can expect from the source.

In the figure below, pick a source from its table and move theta\\theta. It opens on a vibrator at 50°; find the angle at which its P falls to half, then compare it with the other four sources.

Source radiation patternsP radiationSH radiationSV radiationP, SH, and SV components each have characteristic radiation lobes from a point source

The five idealised sources

  • Explosion (a monopole). A sudden increase in volume pushes outward equally: P is the same at every theta\\theta, always a compression, and there is no S. Dynamite in a shot hole and an air gun in water come close, until the free surface above them adds a reflected ghost of opposite polarity, which gives the pair a vertical, frequency-dependent pattern (Section 1.5).
  • Vertical force buried in the rock. A single force, a dipole in acoustic terms, sends P as costheta\\cos\\theta: a compression below, a rarefaction above, and a null along the horizontal. It sends S as sintheta\\sin\\theta, (V_mathrmP/V_mathrmS)2(V\_{\\mathrm P}/V\_{\\mathrm S})^2 times larger than the P peak and strongest sideways. It is not a force dipole (two opposed forces), whose P goes as cos2theta\\cos^2\\theta.
  • Vertical force on the free surface. A vibrator or a weight drop pushes on the surface, not inside the rock, and the free surface reshapes the pattern (Miller and Pursey, 1954). In a Poisson solid, V_mathrmP/V_mathrmS=sqrt3V\_{\\mathrm P}/V\_{\\mathrm S} = \\sqrt 3, the P falls to half at 60° and to nothing along the ground. The S has a node where sintheta=V_mathrmS/V_mathrmP\\sin\\theta = V\_{\\mathrm S}/V\_{\\mathrm P} and peaks just beyond it, near 38°, at 2.4 times the P peak. Most of the energy leaves as neither (Miller and Pursey, 1955): 67 % goes into the Rayleigh wave along the surface (ground roll), 26 % into S and only 7 % into P.
  • Horizontal force buried in the rock. A force that pushes sideways inside the rock, such as a downhole shear source, sends P as sintheta\\sin\\theta, with its null straight down, and S as costheta\\cos\\theta, strongest straight down. That is why a horizontal source is used when you want S at the target. A shear vibrator on the surface is reshaped by the free surface, as the vibrator is, and its P also vanishes along the ground (Cherry, 1962); the figure draws the buried force only.
  • Slip on a fault (a double couple). Two opposed force couples with no net torque, the model of an earthquake or a microseismic event. P goes as sin2psi\\sin 2\\psi, with psi\\psi measured from the fault plane: four lobes of alternating polarity, with nulls along the fault plane and along the plane perpendicular to it. S goes as cos2psi\\cos 2\\psi, strongest where P is null.

Reading the figure

At the opening state the vibrator sends P toward 50° at −4.2 dB of its straight-down peak, and a reflector at 2000 m returns that ray at 4770 m offset. At 60° (6930 m) the P is down to half, −6 dB, and along the ground it is gone. The same source’s S peak is 2.4 times its P peak, at 38°. Loosen the ground (V_mathrmP/V_mathrmSV\_{\\mathrm P}/V\_{\\mathrm S} of 4) and the P curve in (c) hardly moves, while the S node closes in to 14.5° and the S peak grows to 14 times the P peak.

Why this matters for geometry

A vertical source’s P null lies along the ground, at 90°, which no reflection reaches: even a far receiver records a reflection that left the source well below the horizontal, at 60° for an offset of 3.5 times the target depth. What the null does is keep the direct P weak along the surface, where the ground roll carries most of a surface source’s energy instead. The real limit at far offsets is the steady loss of P with angle, 6 dB at 60° for a vibrator, which adds to the spreading loss and to the change of the reflection coefficient with angle. For slip on a fault the nulls cut through the recording array itself: above a vertical fault, receivers on either side record P of opposite polarity, and stacking them without correcting the polarity cancels the event.

References

  • Aki, K., Richards, P. G. (2002). Quantitative Seismology (2nd ed.). University Science Books.
  • Cherry, J. T. (1962). The azimuthal and polar radiation patterns obtained from a horizontal stress applied at the surface of an elastic half space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 52, 27–36.
  • Miller, G. F., Pursey, H. (1954). The field and radiation impedance of mechanical radiators on the free surface of a semi-infinite isotropic solid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 223, 521–541.
  • Miller, G. F., Pursey, H. (1955). On the partition of energy between elastic waves in a semi-infinite solid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 233, 55–69.
  • Sheriff, R. E., Geldart, L. P. (1995). Exploration Seismology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Pritchett, W. C. (1990). Acquiring Better Seismic Data. Chapman & Hall.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.