Time & space sampling; aliasing
Learning objectives
- State the Nyquist limits in time, , and in space,
- Predict the frequency at which a signal above is recorded
- Explain why a dipping event aliases along a receiver line above , and where its energy goes
- Choose and that keep the signal band at the steepest dip of interest
Every digital seismic record is sampled twice: in time, every at each receiver, and in space, every along the line. Each sampling keeps only a band. Samples every hold frequencies below the Nyquist frequency ; traces every hold wavenumbers below . Anything beyond folds back into the band, where its samples are identical to those of a real signal. This is aliasing, and nothing done to the data afterwards can undo it.
Temporal aliasing
A sinusoid of frequency sampled at gives exactly the samples of one at , where is the whole number nearest , so always lies between 0 and . At = 4 ms, = 125 Hz and a 170 Hz component is recorded as 80 Hz. Because the fold cannot be undone, every recording system passes the analog signal through an anti-alias filter before its sampler, cutting at roughly 0.8 . In practice, then, choosing chooses the top of the recorded band: about 100 Hz at 4 ms and 200 Hz at 2 ms.
Spatial aliasing
In space the only filter ahead of the sampler is the receiver group itself, and it removes only part of the steep energy. A dipping event reaches each receiver a little later than the last, with time dip . At frequency that is a wavenumber along the line, so the higher the frequency, the higher the wavenumber. For a wave reaching the surface at angle through velocity , as in a shot record, . For a reflector dipping at in a stack or zero-offset section, where time is two-way, . The event keeps its true wavenumber only up to the frequency where reaches :
Above its energy folds to false dips; between and the dip is reversed. The traces themselves can look innocent, because the eye follows an isolated event from trace to trace. The damage appears when processing treats the traces as samples of a continuous wavefield: f-k filtering, trace interpolation, DMO and migration. In the figure, drag the trace spacing and watch plate (b), which rebuilds the wavefield between the traces the way those processes do, and plate (c), where the folded energy crosses to the wrong side of .
The figure opens on a 30 Hz Ricker wavelet on a 30° dip under 2000 m/s, in a stack. Its band reaches = 66 Hz, but traces every 25 m keep that dip only to 40 Hz: 21 % of the wavelet’s energy folds to false dips, and (b) rebuilds the event as beads with ghosts between the traces. The largest spacing that keeps the whole band is 15 m: 27 traces on the 400 m line instead of 17.
Why this controls bin size
Turn the condition around and it becomes the design rule. To keep every frequency up to at dips up to , the spacing must satisfy
for a CMP bin, and for receivers in a shot record, with the velocity just above the steepest reflector. It is the shortest wavelength, , that sets the limit, not the dominant one. The two rules agree, because CMP bins are half the station interval: 50 m stations give 25 m bins. With = 3000 m/s, = 60 Hz and a 30° dip, the bin must be 25 m or less, which is where the familiar 25 m bin of Part 3 comes from. Steeper dips, slower rock or a higher all shrink it, and every halving of the bin doubles the channel count along that direction.
References
- Bracewell, R. N. (1999). The Fourier Transform and Its Applications (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Shannon, C. E. (1949). Communication in the presence of noise. Proceedings of the IRE, 37(1), 10–21.
- Vermeer, G. J. O. (1990). Seismic Wavefield Sampling. SEG Geophysical Monograph 4.
- Vermeer, G. J. O. (2002). 3-D Seismic Survey Design. SEG Geophysical References 12.
- Yilmaz, Ö. (2001). Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data (2 vols.). SEG Investigations in Geophysics 10.