Source taxonomy: impulsive vs extended
Learning objectives
- Distinguish impulsive sources (dynamite, air-gun) from extended sources (vibroseis, marine vib)
- Recognise that extended sources need pilot-correlation to become impulsive-equivalent
- State the Klauder wavelet as the effective wavelet after correlation
- Predict which source type is preferable for a given environment
Seismic sources come in two families. Impulsive sources release their energy in milliseconds — dynamite detonations, air-gun bubbles, weight drops. Extended sources release the same energy over several seconds — vibroseis sweeps, marine vibrators, harmonic sources. The two families share the same physics downstream but demand very different fieldwork and signal-processing pipelines.
Why the pilot correlation matters
An impulsive source is already near-ideal: a short pulse with broadband spectrum. Extended sources look nothing like that — in the raw recording, every reflection shows up as a smeared-out chirp several seconds long, and consecutive reflections overlap each other mercilessly.
The trick is to record the pilot sweep (the exact waveform sent into the ground) and cross-correlate the recording with the pilot. The auto-correlation of a sweep is the Klauder wavelet — short, symmetric, with bandwidth equal to the sweep band. After correlation, each reflection collapses to a Klauder wavelet at its correct two-way time. The data becomes processable.
When to pick each
- Dynamite: the most impulsive source available. Used in land surveys where permitting allows, shot in deep holes for good coupling and surface-ghost suppression. Banned or limited in many regions.
- Air-gun array: the standard marine impulsive. High peak pressure; environmental-impact concerns drive current research.
- Vibroseis: standard land extended source. Safer than dynamite, reusable, with precise force control. Required for urban/sensitive areas.
- Marine vibrator: emerging; halves peak SPL at similar total energy (§1.7).
References
- Pritchett, W. C. (1990). Acquiring Better Seismic Data. Chapman & Hall.
- Sheriff, R. E., Geldart, L. P. (1995). Exploration Seismology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Yilmaz, Ö. (2001). Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data (2 vols.). SEG Investigations in Geophysics 10.