Minifrac and DFIT

Part 7, Part 7: Fracturing the Rock

Learning objectives

  • Define a minifrac (DFIT) as a small deliberate fracture run to measure Shmin precisely
  • Read the pressure falloff after shut-in and pick the closure pressure
  • Use the specialized falloff plots, the square-root-of-time and G-function tangents, to find closure
  • Recover the canon Shmin of 46 MPa from the closure pick

The Fracture Run to Measure, Not to Produce

The last section showed that any hydraulic fracture, on shut-in, bleeds down to a closure pressure equal to ShminS_{hmin}hmin. A minifrac, also called a diagnostic fracture injection test or DFIT, is a small fracture pumped for exactly that reason: not to stimulate the well, but to measure the stress. A modest volume is injected to open a short fracture, the pumps are stopped, and the pressure decline is recorded and analyzed with care. It is the best ShminS_{hmin}hmin measurement money can buy, more reliable than a leak-off test because the fracture is fully developed and the decline is watched patiently, and it is standard practice before designing a full stimulation.

Minifrac DfitInteractive figure, enable JavaScript to interact.

The subtlety is picking where the fracture closes, because the pressure decline is a smooth curve with no obvious kink. The trick is to plot the falloff in transformed time so the closure appears as a change in slope. On a plot against the square root of shut-in time, the data fall on a straight line while the fracture is still open, then depart from that line at closure; the departure point is ShminS_{hmin}hmin. The more refined G-function method, an industry standard, transforms time to account for the fluid leaking off into the rock, so that fracture closure shows as a clean tangent departure. Drag the closure pick in the figure onto the departure and the tool scores it against the true ShminS_{hmin}hmin of 46 MPa: a good pick lands within a fraction of a megapascal, a careless one biases the entire stress model.

Why the Care Is Worth It

The precision matters because ShminS_{hmin}hmin is the linchpin. It is the fracture gradient that limits every future injection, the ceiling of the mud-weight window, the anchor that the polygon uses to bound SHmaxS_{Hmax}Hmax, and the reference against which depletion is tracked. An error in the closure pick propagates into all of them. This is why the DFIT is run and read with a rigor out of proportion to its small size, and why the specialized falloff plots exist at all: they turn a subtle, judgment-laden pick into a defensible, reproducible one. The minifrac is where the theory of this part meets the discipline of measurement, and it is the workhorse ShminS_{hmin}hmin measurement that Part 8 will use to anchor the Ogbon-1 stress model. The next section leaves precise measurement behind for scale: growing a fracture big enough to produce through.

References

  • Nolte, K. G. (1979). Determination of fracture parameters from fracturing pressure decline. SPE 8341.
  • Barree, R. D., Barree, V. L., & Craig, D. P. (2009). Holistic fracture diagnostics: Consistent interpretation of prefrac injection tests using multiple analysis methods. SPE Production & Operations, 24(3), 396-406.
  • Zoback, M. D. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press.

This page is prerendered for SEO and accessibility. The interactive widgets above hydrate on JavaScript load.